1996, 53 minutes, color, Discovery Channel
See a full transcript of this video!
Summary
When toxicologist Svetla Balabanova discovered heavy concentrations of both cocaine and
nicotine in mummies from a Munich, Germany museum, many questions were raised. Initially,
she was accused of sloppy lab work or instrument contamination. That ruled out,
contamination of the mummies themselves was considered. Did the materials get into the
mummies from later contamination? Hair shaft tests proved that some nicotine was
consumed. Were the mummies fakes, common in museums, faked and purchased during the last
century. Apparently not.
The video is a good demonstration of how science works to eliminate possibilities. For
example, it is possible that nicotine-bearing plants were available in Africa. Left open,
is the question of cocaine, apparently only available in South America.
This leads to questions of transoceanic contact which are explored in detail in the last
half of the video. Skeptics point out how scanty the evidence really is for trade routes
that might have included America. Some good scholars (Kehoe, Bernal) favor the evidence
and believe that trade was likely. The narrator raises some seriously erroneous issues
about how science works. Pay careful attention to the concluding remarks.
Questions
| Main | Outline | Brief | Brief Schedule | Debunking Tools | Video Guides | Projects | Final |
larry-zimmerman@uiowa.edu
University of Iowa Anthropology
08/18/98