Lost Tribes, Sunken Continents and Ancient Astronauts:
"Cult" Archaeology & Creationism

Video Guide

Cutsey animals walking into ark

In Search of Noah's Ark

1976, Shick-Sunn Classic Pictures, running time 99 minutes, color

Summary

This video precursor to the 1993 The Incredible Discovery of Noah's Ark (seeark reconstruction http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/ark-hoax/jammal.html for an exposé) is a pseudodocumentary with three parts. The first looks at the Biblical story of Noah and his ark. The second recounts the many expeditions to find the ark on Mt. Arrarat in Turkey. The third looks at the "scientific" evidence for the ark. The style of production is old and stilted, but the argumentation style is classic pseudoscience put to the service of religious proof.

Questions

  1. Why is the Noah's Ark story so powerful? How widely distributed is the story among world cultures? What does the video claim about this? What are the gaps or problems with this claim?

  2. What forms of argumentation are obvious in the video?

  3. What role have hoaxes played in the Noah's ark story? How are these treated in the video?

  4. How does the evidence and its presentation here compare with the appraches of Von Daniken and others?

  5. Why is science used in the ways it is in this video?

For a humorous look, see below!

Three arks?