
Armand Minthorn is a Umatilla man who appeared in the segment. He responds to the way the segment was edited in Kennewick Man issue damages relationships. For more detail on the entire case, see the Kennewick Man Virtual Interpretive Center from the Tri-City Herald. FOr a wide range of opinions, see also Skull Wars (2001) by David Hurst Thomas; Ancient Encounters (2001), by James Chatters (who was the first scientist to see the remains); The Riddle of the Bones (2000), by journalist Roger Downey; and No Bone Unturned (2003) by Jeff Benedict. See also a Seattle Weekly special issue on Kennewick
Questions:
1. What are the core legal issues in the case of the Ancient One/Kennewick
Man?
2. What are the primary beliefs expressed about the issue by Armand Minthorn?
How does the editing make him appear?
3. What are the beliefs of the scientists? How does the editing make them
appear?
4. Do you see any particular biases?
5. Does Leslie Stahl use stereotypes of Indians? If so, what are they?
6. Does the piece echo old stereotypes about Indians as some have maintained?